*the audio is very terrible, I apologize*
Self-Score
Criteria A-7
Criteria B-6
I showed awareness of main literary features that Ishiguro uses throughout the book. I also explained how each quote was an example of a literary feature, as well as its meaning in regards to the theme which then had an effect on the reader. Though I believe I could have offered more meanings to the quotes as well as show the greater effect on the reader.
Criteria C-4
I think that my IOC was very organized. I gave clear background information and context on both the book and the specific passage. I stated my thesis and also gave specific, clear examples and explained how they supported my thesis. I ended my IOC with a conclusion relating back to thesis and also connecting to a bigger picture as well as a possible author's purpose. I think I could have made my thesis more clear.
Criteria D-5
I used clear and appropriate language. I used the diction of the book when referring back to it. and even considered connotations of words that I used in order to display their effect on the reader. Despite a few pauses and slips, my grammar was mostly correct. My terminology and structure were appropriate and effective in communicating my thesis and examples.

Sutton:
ReplyDeleteOMG. The sound is awfulllll (so my apologies if I miss something you did). You sound like you are in a tin can. Or that you are a ghost. You pick.
I think? I agree with your self-assessment comments, knowing you as a student/person. Some things I noticed:
Make sure you keep looping back to your thesis/statement of purpose when you get to each "section"- it makes it easier for your listener and helps organization.
Be sure you are using this formula: device/feature that helps with purpose/theme, example, meaning, and effect. At times, it seems like you are just paraphrasing and giving your own opinion and not really discussing the HOW the author does whatever you say he does and WHY